Legal Opinion

Citizens National Bank v. Alexander

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1905No. 5,140PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom Decatur Circuit Court; Francis T. Uord, Judge. Action by the Citizens National Bank of Greerisburg against Mary M. Alexander. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

The complaint was in two paragraphs. The second was dismissed. The first was upon a promissory note against appellee and others for $2,000.

Plaintiff dismissed as to all the defendants except Mary M. Alexander. The plaintiff had an examination of all of the defendants, under §§517-521 Burns 1901, §§509-513 R. S. 1881, and, for failure to answer questions, moved for judgment against Mary M. Alexander under §521, supra, basing the same upon the affidavit of the president pf the appellant bank and making the examination of said parties defendant a part of the motion. "Upon leave of court Mary M.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hovey v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Perry, Matthews-Buskirk Stone Co. v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sibley v. SibleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. Studabaker v. MarkleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Harley v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kwiatkowski v. PutzhavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Springer v. BrickerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lupton v. CoffelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Cunningham v. HilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Miedreich v. FryeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API