State v. Yanick
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
LUNDSTEN, PJ.
¶ 1. Martin Yanick is now serving an imposed and stayed prison sentence following revocation of his probation. He seeks sentence credit against this sentence for time he alleges he spent serving jail time as a condition of probation. A dispute over this conditional jail time arises because it overlaps with time Yanick spent serving an unrelated prison sentence. The circuit court denied sentence credit for this overlapping time. We reverse. We conclude that, when a defendant has served conditional jail time and his or her probation is later revoked and the defendant commences…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. GilbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. BeetsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. BoettcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- State v. TuescherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009