Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce Commission

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 7, 1990No. Nos. 1-89-2775, 1-89-2807, 1-89-2808, 1-89-2966,1-89-3166,1-89-3481 consPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

I. Nature Of The Case

This is the second time this case has been before the Illinois courts. In October of 1985, the Illinois Commerce Commission (hereinafter the Commission) issued a decision allowing Commonwealth Edison Company (hereinafter Edison) an increase in rates of approximately $495 million annually. The bases of the rate increase were the costs Edison incurred in constructing the Byron Unit I nuclear generating station. Of the $2.55 billion in costs Edison submitted for inclusion in the rate base, the Commission found $101.5 million to be unreasonable and therefore disallowed. Costs…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. VanceIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Illinois Power Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. Village of Niles v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API