People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. Illinois Commerce Commission
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bilandic
Pursuant to section 9 — 201 of the Public Utilities Act (Act), Commonwealth Edison sought an increase in the rates charged to its customers before the Illinois Commerce Commission (Commission), the statutorily authorized ratemaking agency. (111. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. lll2/3, par. 1 — 101 et seq.) Edison sought this rate increase to recoup $2.55 billion in costs it incurred in constructing its Byron Unit I nuclear generating facility (Byron I). This consolidated appeal involves several judicial and administrative orders which subsequently flowed from Edison seeking this rate increase.
This is…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Estate of Wernick v. MacKsIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
- Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co. v. SlatteryIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
- Business & Professional People for the Public Interest v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Granite City Division of National Steel Co. v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Medcom Holding Company, Cross-Appellee v. Baxter Travenol Laboratories, Inc., and Medtrain, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Citizens Utility Board v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- United Cities Gas Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
- Continental Mobile Telephone Company, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.