Legal Opinion

People v. Behrmann

California Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1949No. Crim. 5004Published

1Opinion of the Court

34 Cal.2d 459 (1949)

THE PEOPLE, Respondent,

v.

PAUL R. BEHRMANN, Appellant.

Crim. No. 5004.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

Nov. 22, 1949.

Morris Lavine, Owen A. Bartlett and Jack B. Tenney for Appellant.

Fred N. Howser, Attorney General, James A. Doherty and William E. James, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent.

SCHAUER, J.

The principal question in this case is whether an orally given notice of appeal from judgments of conviction of felony and from an order denying defendant's motion for new trial is effective to perfect an appeal. We have concluded that it is not and that, since no…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cox v. Tyrone Power Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. In Re HorowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API