Legal Opinion

Bell v. Bancroft

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1916No. 5816PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from- District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Action by Edgar A. Bancroft against R. D. Bell. From judgment denying application of defendant to set aside judgment, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter styled the “defendant,” filed an application in the district court of Garvin county to vacate a default judgment in favor of defendant in error, hereinafter styled the “plaintiff,” against him upon service by publication, and praying to be let in to defend in' said action. As required by section 4728, Rev. Laws 1910, the defendant filed an answer with his application to vacate the judgment and be let in to defend. The plaintiff filed a motion to strike the application of defendant, for the reason that the application and exhibits were…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Gannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Adkins v. ArnoldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Campbell v. NewmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Thraves v. GreenleesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barnett v. DouglasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Pasotex Petroleum Company, a Corporation v. M.B. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  3. Cummins v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. Welch v. RubySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API