Legal Opinion

Duracell Inc. v. SW Consultants, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided May 17, 1989No. 1:88-CV-2786-RHHPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBERT H. HALL, District Judge.

This case is before the court on four motions representing the parties’ inability to settle disputes regarding discovery. Plaintiff has filed a motion to compel and defendants have filed a motion for a protective order both involving certain interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Two nonparties, Amcel Corporation (“Amcel”) and Activ Industries (“Activ”) have also filed motions for protective orders in response to subpoenas duces tecum served upon them by plaintiff.

This case was brought by a large manufacturer of alkaline batteries,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. American Standard Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. And Howmedica, Inc., and Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  3. Empire of Carolina, Inc. v. MackleDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1985
  4. Tavoulareas v. PiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
  5. Cutler v. Lewiston Daily SunDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  2. Brittain v. Stroh Brewery Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1991
  3. Cytodyne Technologies, Inc. v. Biogenic Technologies, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
  4. Michrotech International, Inc. v. Fair, No. 32 83 08 (Sep. 18, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
  5. Fusion Elite All Stars v. Nfinity Athletics LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API