Legal Opinion
State v. Hill
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided October 3, 1962No. File 25029PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.
The defendant, after a plea of not guilty to an information charging him with the erime of possessing narcotic drugs in violation of § 19-246 of the General Statutes, elected trial by a jury of twelve and in advance of assignment for trial filed a motion to suppress certain evidence claimed to have been illegally obtained by search and seizure in violation of the constitution of the United States. The sole question for determination is whether or not, under our procedure, such a motion can be properly made and entertained by the court at this time.
No motion of the type under consideration has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- State v. CarolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DeLormeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963