Legal Opinion
State v. Carol
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1935PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The defendant was informed against for keeping intoxicating liquor with intent to sell, without having a lawful permit to do so. He pleaded not guilty and elected to be tried by the jury. Just before the jury were impaneled his counsel stated to the court that in arresting the defendant the officers, without a warrant, violently broke into his home and unlawfully seized alcoholic liquor and other implements, and claimed that in so doing they violated §§ 8 and 9 of Article First of the Constitution of this State and § 1 of Article 14 of the Constitution of the United States. He orally moved…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Pickett v. Antonio Marcucci's Liquors & ContainersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Bruchal v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. DukesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. MarianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- State v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.