State v. Hartstein
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Defendant was charged with and found guilty of “wilfully, unlawfully and knowingly have[ing] in [his] possession obscene, lewd, licentious, indecent and lascivious pictures with intent to publish and circulate said pictures by projecting the aforesaid pictures on a screen before divers persons” in violation of § 563.280 (all statutory references are to RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S.). He has appealed from the ensuing judgment.
We have jurisdiction of this appeal, although the offense is a misdemeanor, because questions are presented which involve the construction of certain…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Freedman v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Jacobellis v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Wampler v. BirdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Price v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Cherokee News & Arcade, Inc. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1973
- Kansas City v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- State v. HoelscherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.