Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Morris v. Leonard

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1999No. 99-937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Morris asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Morris’s assertion is merit-less.

Morris did not comply with the R.C. 2725.04(D) requirement to attach all of his pertinent commitment papers. Boyd v. Money (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 388, 389, 696 N.E.2d 568, 569. It is apparent that Morris is incarcerated not because of his 1994 sentence, which placed him on probation, but due to a revocation of that probation. Morris did not attach any revocation entry to his petition.

In addition, Morris’s plea of guilty to the charge contained in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boyd v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Beaucamp v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Simon v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Morris v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API