State ex rel. Morris v. Leonard
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Morris asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Morris’s assertion is merit-less.
Morris did not comply with the R.C. 2725.04(D) requirement to attach all of his pertinent commitment papers. Boyd v. Money (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 388, 389, 696 N.E.2d 568, 569. It is apparent that Morris is incarcerated not because of his 1994 sentence, which placed him on probation, but due to a revocation of that probation. Morris did not attach any revocation entry to his petition.
In addition, Morris’s plea of guilty to the charge contained in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Boyd v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Beaucamp v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Shroyer v. BanksOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Simon v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2002
- State ex rel. Morris v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court · 1999