Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Beaucamp v. Lazaroff

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1997No. 96-1440PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Beaucamp asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus action. He claims that the common pleas court lost jurisdiction to convict him where he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his constitutional right to be prosecuted by indictment. See Wells v. Sacks (1962), 115 Ohio App. 219, 20 O.O.2d 304, 184 N.E.2d 449.

The manner by which an accused is charged with a crime, whether by indictment returned by a grand jury or by information filed by the prosecuting attorney, is procedural rather than jurisdictional. Wells v. Maxwell (1963), 174 Ohio St. 198,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stacy v. Van CorenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State ex rel. Simpson v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Wells v. SacksOhio Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Orr v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State ex rel. Beaver v. KontehOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Thornton v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. VanBuskirk v. WingardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Palmer-Donavin v. Roofing, 06ap-699 (5-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API