State ex rel. Beaucamp v. Lazaroff
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Beaucamp asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus action. He claims that the common pleas court lost jurisdiction to convict him where he did not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his constitutional right to be prosecuted by indictment. See Wells v. Sacks (1962), 115 Ohio App. 219, 20 O.O.2d 304, 184 N.E.2d 449.
The manner by which an accused is charged with a crime, whether by indictment returned by a grand jury or by information filed by the prosecuting attorney, is procedural rather than jurisdictional. Wells v. Maxwell (1963), 174 Ohio St. 198,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stacy v. Van CorenOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- State ex rel. Simpson v. LazaroffOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Wells v. SacksOhio Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by26 opinions
- Orr v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. Beaver v. KontehOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Thornton v. RussellOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- VanBuskirk v. WingardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Palmer-Donavin v. Roofing, 06ap-699 (5-10-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.