Haworth, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.

OPINION

ENSLEN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Haworth Inc.’s appeal from Magistrate Judge Rowland’s May 3,1995 Order granting defendant’s motion to compel. Plaintiff argues that the magistrate erroneously ordered the disclosure of privileged attorney work product. Defendant Herman Miller, Inc. argues that the information is discoverable as information provided plaintiffs expert witness to assist the expert in forming his opinion.

FACTS

This case is a patent infringement action, the specific facts of which are not relevant to the issue presented by this appeal. On March…