Legal Opinion

Bolden v. Stange

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided April 30, 2024No. 4:19-cv-00126Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION DARRELL I. BOLDEN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) No. 4:19-CV-126 RLW ) BILL STANGE,1 ) ) Respondents. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL This closed state prisoner habeas case under

28 U.S.C. § 2254

is before the Court on petitioner Darrell I. Bolden’s pro se Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (ECF No. 51). Respondent opposes the motion (ECF No. 56), and petitioner filed a Reply in support (ECF No. 58). For the following reasons, the Court finds that the motion is an unauthorized successive habeas…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Willie E. Boyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. John Gregory LambrosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  4. Ward v. NorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. Bolden v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API