Legal Opinion

Monart Motors Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Because we reach the conclusion that the circuit court should have overruled Monart’s demurrer to the first affirmative defense and ordered judgment dismissing the complaint, it will be unnecessary to discuss the propriety of the circuit court’s action in directing a verdict for defendant.

*604Apparently the parties agreed that the circuit court, in ruling upon the demurrer, should have the county court file before it. It appears that the assets of the Boeing estate were not of great value. The petition for administration made by Monart alleges that the value of the assets did not exceed $1,000. A…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ShaferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Sims v. Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of La PrairieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Waukesha Savings, Building & Loan Ass'n v. HamillWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Rissling v. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Payne v. MeisserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Ruckel v. GassnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dore & Associates Contracting, Inc. v. American Druggists' Insurance Co. (In Re Dore & Associates Contracting, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API