Wenkosky v. Protective Insurance
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
NEALON, Chief Judge.
Currently before the court is a diversity action in which plaintiff Frank Wenkosky seeks a declaratory judgment on the issue of defendant Protective Insurance Company’s (Protective) obligation to defend and indemnify plaintiff pursuant to an automobile insurance policy. For the reasons that follow, the court will declare that the insurance policy does not afford coverage to plaintiff for any claims arising out of the accident on August 23, 1983.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff is an adult individual residing at Lake Ariel, Pennsylvania. At all times relevant to this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- American Home Products Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mohn v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Celley v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Canal Insurance Company v. Underwriters at Lloyd's LondonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,034 Prestige Casualty Company v. Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Empire Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- R.E. Turner, Inc. v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.