Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Harrill
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, J. —
This action was to enforce payment of a promissory note given as the balance due on the purchase price of a certain lot, payable on demand, subject to the following condition appearing upon the back of the note:
“Shelley, Idaho,
“March 20, 1922.
“This signed by the payer under the express understanding that it shall be payable only after removal of a certain lien filed by the Boise Payette Lumber Company against a part of Lot one, Block thirty, in the Village of Shelley, Idaho.
“It is further understood that if the aforesaid lien shall not have been removed within one year from the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Satterwhite v. . GallagherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Kinsman v. City of SpoKaneWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Adams Express Co. v. AldridgeColorado Court of Appeals · 1904
- Bird Timber Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938