Weida v. State

OPINION

KIRSCH, Judge.

Charles Ray Weida, III appeals his conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated,1 a Class D felony, and his sentence enhancement for being an habitual substance offender. He raises five issues for our review:

I. Whether the State presented sufficient independent proof of the corpus delicti so that Weida’s admission to being the driver of the vehicle was admissible.

II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Weida’s conviction.

III. Whether Weida was subjected to an impermissible double enhancement of his sentence.

IV. Whether the trial court properly instructed…