Beebe v. . Estabrook
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the third judicial department, affirming a judgment, entered upon the report of a referee. (Reported below, 14 Hun, 523.) The nature of the action and the facts are- sot forth sufficiently in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.
This action is brought for an accounting- and distribution of the estate of Hobart Estabrook, deceased, who died intestate on the 18th day of May, 1872, leaving his widow him surviving and five sons and a grandchild, the daughter of a deceased daughter of the intestate, and a great-granddaughter the daughter of a deceased grandchild whose mother, also a daughter of the intestate had died in his lifetime, his only descendants. The intestate left no real estate, but personal property only. Prior to his death ho had given various sums to his children. He gave to each of them on their marriage…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Prowitt v. . RodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of MullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of The Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- In re the Estate of HarrisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of ToneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- New York Yellow Cab Co. Sales Agency, Inc. v. Courtlandt Garage & Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.