Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Nickerson
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided March 18, 2004No. 06-03-00036-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice ROSS.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company appeals from a judgment in an underinsured motorist (UM) lawsuit. State Farm complains not about damages or liability, but originally complained only about the court’s order directing the insurer to pay Nickerson’s attorney’s fees and to also pay prejudgment interest from the date of the fifing of the underlying lawsuit. State Farm, based on the Texas Supreme Court’s action denying petition in Menix v. Allstate Indem. Co., 83 S.W.3d 877 (Tex.App.-Eastland 2002, pets, denied [2 pets. ]), has now withdrawn its issue…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ellis v. WaldropTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Henson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. BonnerTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Novosad v. Mid-Century Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994
- Sikes v. ZuloagaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brainard v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teresa NickersonTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Imelda Gonzales, Juan Hinojosa, and Romeo and Mary Saenz v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
- Lilith Brainard v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006