Legal Opinion

Krofcheck v. Downey State Bank

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1978No. 15488PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Plaintiff Joseph Krofcheck seeks to have the judgment in Downey State Bank v. Major Blakeney Corp. 1 (herein referred to as the Downey case) declared invalid and not binding on him because of his contention that the affidavit for publication of summons was insufficient and the court did not acquire jurisdiction over him; and plaintiff claims alternatively that if he is not granted that relief, he should be awarded damages against attorney George D. Melling (and his firm Fabian & Clendenin, who represented Downey Bank in the prior suit), alleging that said attorney filed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wheadon v. PearsonUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Penrod v. Nu Creation Creme, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Church v. Meadow Springs Ranch Corp., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. RuscettaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API