Legal Opinion

Quinn v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 14, 1969No. 53431PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELBORN, Commissioner.

The question in this case, arising by way of an action to quiet title, is whether, upon the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway’s ceasing operations through Poplar Bluff in 1965, the land on which its depot stood reverted to the heirs of the grantor of the land, by virtue of a “reverter” clause in a 1901 deed, or became the property of the Frisco by reason of its ownership of adjacent land. The trial court found in favor of the heirs of the grantor and also awarded them $2,145 for loss of rent and profits. The railroad appeals.

This land was conveyed by a deed, acknowledged…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. WeareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Kellogg v. MalinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  3. Chouteau v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  4. Coates & Hopkins Realty Co. v. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Glosemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. GM Morris Boat Co., Inc. v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Boyles v. Missouri Friends of the Wabash Trace Nature Trail, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Bayless v. GonzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Moore v. Missouri Friends of the Wabash Trace Nature Trail, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API