Legal Opinion

People v. Nawaz

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided November 22, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Sarah L. Krauss, J.

*196Issue Presented

Defendant moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (a) on the ground that it is facially insufficient.

Defendant is charged with criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]).

In determining this motion the court has considered the factual allegations in the accusatory instrument, the underlying order of protection, defendant’s motion papers and the People’s response.

Factual Background

The People allege, by way of a superceding information, served and filed on August 20, 1999, that:

“on or about…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. CaseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Holtzman v. BeattyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MurrayCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API