Legal Opinion

Kirchner v. Marshall

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided January 25, 2021No. 1:20-cv-00114Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 20-cv-00114-MEH JESSE DILLON KIRCHNER, Plaintiff, v. JILL MARSHALL, JUDGE PHILIP JAMES MCNULTY, MIRIAM STOHS, and RACHEL A. OLIVER, Defendants. ORDER Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge. Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF 60) and Plaintiff’s Motion to Cure Deficiencies and associated motions (ECF 63, 64, 66). All Motions are fully briefed, and the Court finds that oral argument will not materially assist in their adjudication. For the reasons that follow, the Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Motion to Cure…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API