Legal Opinion

Duncan v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1992No. CA CR 91-125PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George K. Cracraft, Chief Judge.

Robert Duncan appeals from his conviction of the crime of theft by receiving property valued in excess of $2,500.00, for which he was fined $10,000.00. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict; in allowing the introduction of expert testimony concerning the mathematical probabilities of two keys fitting the same car; and in permitting Ricky Bauer to testify as an expert. We find no error and affirm.

A motion for directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. In addressing such challenges this…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. United States v. Carl MasseyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Tarentino v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of TuckerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Ashlock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Burkett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. White v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  5. Williams v. TitteringtonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API