Legal Opinion

Woehlhoff v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1992No. Cr. 910385PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Justice.

Courtney Woehlhoff appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

Woehlhoff was convicted of theft of property. In his appeal from that conviction, he raised several issues, including an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirmed the conviction without prejudice to Woehlhoff’s right to raise the ineffective-assistance-of-counsel issue in post-conviction relief proceedings. State v. Woehlhoff, 473 N.W.2d 446 (N.D.1991). Woehlhoff applied for relief pursuant to section 29-32.1-01, NDCC, based on his trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. RingquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. RicehillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. MischeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. OverboeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Flanagan v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. HageNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. RothNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. NormanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. WoehlhoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API