Legal Opinion

Carey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1983No. Appeal, No. 211 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

The Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, by order, denied Ervin Carey benefits. He appeals. We affirm.

Carey, a General Electric truck driver, claimed benefits for injuries sustained in a train crossing collision. Benefits were denied, applying Section 301(a) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act,1 which provides in pertinent part:

Every employer shall be liable for compensation for personal injury to, or for the death of such employe, by an injury in the course of his employment.... Provided, That no compensa*12tion shall be paid when the injury or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Abbotts Dairies v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Hemer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. M.D.S. Laboratories & Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. St. Joe Minerals Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Wagner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API