Aurex Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge
We are requested by the House of Representatives, under 28 U.'S.C. §§ 1492 and 2509, to determine whether plaintiff is *4legally or equitably entitled to an award on its claim that it suffered injury as a result of an excessive profits determination under the World War II renegotiation legislation.1
The late Commissioner Eobert K. McConnaughey, after a full trial, filed a careful, detailed, and thorough set of findings. Both parties except to certain of his findings — the plaintiff somewhat more than the defendant — but we are satisfied, after reviewing these exceptions, that they should not be…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Dodge Street Building Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- J.L. Simmons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004