Legal Opinion

Aurex Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 15, 1966No. Cong. No. 12-58PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, Judge

We are requested by the House of Representatives, under 28 U.'S.C. §§ 1492 and 2509, to determine whether plaintiff is *4legally or equitably entitled to an award on its claim that it suffered injury as a result of an excessive profits determination under the World War II renegotiation legislation.1

The late Commissioner Eobert K. McConnaughey, after a full trial, filed a careful, detailed, and thorough set of findings. Both parties except to certain of his findings — the plaintiff somewhat more than the defendant — but we are satisfied, after reviewing these exceptions, that they should not be…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. Penn Foundry & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Dodge Street Building Corporation, a Nebraska Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
  2. J.L. Simmons Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API