Legal Opinion

Jacob Nyce's Executors v. Obertz

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1848PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This is a Writ of Error, directed to the Court of Common Pleas of Sandusky County. The judgment which is sought to be reversed, was rendered by the Court of Common Pleas in an action of covenant, instituted by the defendant in error, in favor of the plaintiff in error.

Read the full summary

This is a Writ of Error, directed to the Court of Common Pleas of Sandusky County. The judgment which is sought to be reversed, was rendered by the Court of Common Pleas in an action of covenant, instituted by the defendant in error, in favor of the plaintiff in error. The facts set forth in the declaration, are as follows: On the 21st of September, 1822, Jacob Nyce, and Margaretta, his wife, by deed duly executed, acknowledged and delivered, for the consideration of five hundred dollars, conveyed to one Adam Peters, eighty acres of land, particularly described in said deed, by which deed the…

1Opinion of the CourtHitchcock, J.

It will be seen that'there is great similarity between this case, and the case of Johnson against the same defendants, decided at the present term. The records show that the lands in which dower had been assigned, or attempted to be assigned, were adjoining lands, and the quantity in each case was not materially variant. At the same time and in the same Court, the same individual had preferred a claim to dower, and in each case and at the same November term of the Court, the defendants were each ordered to pay one hundred thirty-seven dollars and fifty cents, in full of the dower claims. The…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Opinion No. (1989), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1989
  2. Opinion No. 69-241 (1969) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1969
  3. Pattison v. JordanOhio Circuit Courts · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API