Legal Opinion

Pattison v. Jordan

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided January 15, 1888Published

Appeal from the Court of Common. Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The claims of the parties, as made by the pleadings, are substantially as follows: .

The plaintiffs, Pattisoii and wife, say,, that prior to.November 24th, 1865, Henry F. Sedam, being the owner of a tract of *235land in Sfcorrs Township, which is now a part of Cincinnati, had prepared a plat thereof as'a'second subdivivision by him of the village of Sedamsville. This plat (which was not .then recorded, and, in fact, never was), was exhibited by Sedam to Pattison, showing a division thereof into lots of the frontages- and depths, indicated thereon and consecutively numbered, and including lots No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schlief v. HartOhio Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Jacob Nyce's Executors v. ObertzOhio Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Starke's Lessee v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1832

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API