Legal Opinion

Houtz v. Gisborn

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1874PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Third Judicial District. The facts appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtEmerson, J.

The Appellants in this cause aver in their complaint, that they together with one 'William Clark, are the owners of a mining claim, known as the Shoo Fly Lode Westerly, in Ophir Mining District in Tooele County, in this Territory, and also aver. a full and complete compliance upon their part with all the laws, local rules and regulations respecting mining property, and averring and setting up a complete possessory right'in themselves and said Clark.

The complaint sets out the discovery and location of said claim, and the Appellants’ claim of title from the locators, but alleges that one of the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lavagnino v. UhligUtah Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Spanish Fork West Field Irr. Co. v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Keyser v. PollockUtah Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ferguson v. BurtUtah Supreme Court · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API