Legal Opinion

Kent v. Water Commissioners of the Barnstable Fire District

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 4, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

This is a bill in equity by Kent, the owner of a tract of land in Barnstable, against the commissioners1 *161administering the waterworks of the fire district created by St. 1926, c. 109, in accordance with St. 1934, c. 302. The bill seeks cancellation of Kent’s guaranty of revenue dated May 9, 1949, mentioned below. The commissioners filed a counterclaim for amounts alleged to be due under the guaranty. The trial judge made voluntary findings. A final decree was entered holding the guaranty to be valid and ordering Kent to pay to the district, with costs, the sum of $651.17 owed under the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Moseley v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Uccello v. Gold'n Foods, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  3. Norton v. ChiodaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Hurlburt v. Town of Great BarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  5. Board of Health of Woburn v. SousaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Flynn v. BrassardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  2. Town of Natick v. Massachusetts Department of Public WelfareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. State v. DempseyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  4. Maine v. BurnettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API