Legal Opinion

Aaron v. Woodcock

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1925No. Appeal, 149PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Moschziskee,

This is a proceeding under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act of June 18, 1923, P. L. 840, to determine whether plaintiff is entitled to a new term of ten years at the expiration of a lease for that period, or whether he is entitled to a term from year to year only. The court below decided in favor of the longer term, and defendant has appealed.

Both parties stated at the bar of this court that they had elected to treat the statute under which these proceedings were brought as constitutional, hence no question was raised on that point; and since the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kaufmann v. LiggettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Kollock v. ScribnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Stetler v. North Branch Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Cairns v. LlewellynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Lesley v. RandolphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Cryan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Pettit v. TourisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  3. List's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Briggs v. City of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Solomon v. Neisner Bros.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API