Bradshaw v. Ashley
Supreme Court of the United States
error to the court of appeals of THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court;
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Peckham
The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, brought this action of ejectment in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia to recover from the defendant the possession of one undivided fifth part of certain lots in the city of Washington, in square 939, sometimes described as lots 1, 2 and 3 in that square, and sometimes as lots 4, 5 and 6;. and he also sued to recover an undivided fourth part of another lot in the same square, sometimes designated as lot 20 and sometimes as lot 3. Entry and ouster were alleged to have taken place on March 22, 1889, and in another count on November…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- De Vaughn v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sabariego v. MaverickSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Wilson v. PalmerTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- Christy v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Smith ex dem. Teller v. LorillardNew York Supreme Court · 1813
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Reiter v. Coastal States Gas Producing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
- Beaufort Land & Investment Co. v. New River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Water, Light & Gas Co. of Hutchinson v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Shapiro v. ChristopherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Warren v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.