Legal Opinion

Alston v. Black River Electric Cooperative

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 25, 2001No. 25310PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLER, Justice:

This case presents the novel issue of whether members of an electric cooperative should be per se disqualified from serving on a jury when the cooperative is a party. Affirming the trial court, the Court of Appeals rejected a rule of per se disqualification. Alston v. Black River Elec. Coop., 338 S.C. 543, 527 S.E.2d 119 (Ct.App.2000). We granted a writ of certiorari and now reverse.

FACTS

Petitioner Michael Alston sued respondent Black River Electric Cooperative (“Black River”) for negligence in connection with a fire on his property. According to the complaint, Alston was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Whittley v. City of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Grady Paul Chestnut v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  3. State v. ThomlinsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Bookhart v. Central Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Ozark Border Electric Cooperative v. StacyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Turner v. Roman Catholic DioceseSupreme Court of Vermont · 2009
  3. Doe v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Burke v. AnMed HealthCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Vestry & Church Wardens of the Church of the Holy Cross v. Orkin Exterminating Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API