Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentPellegrini, Judge
I respectfully dissent because I believe that to imply unjust enrichment against a claimant is against the legislative scheme embodied in the Workers’ Compensation Act. In any event, even if equitable principles were implied, the doctrine of equitable estoppel should be applied, not unjust enrichment.
After Eric Kiebler (Claimant) suffered a work-related injury, Specialty Tire of America (Employer) issued a Notice of Compensation Payable (NCP) providing a weekly benefit rate of $451.85 for total disability based upon an average weekly wage of $677.77. Because it had allocated Claimant’s 1994…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fahringer, McCarty & Grey, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Sharon Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Edgewater Steel Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Walker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995