Legal Opinion

King v. Rubinsky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 18, 1952No. 3056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALE, Justice.

This suit grew out of a written executory contract for the sale of realty. The contract was dated July 31, 1945. Appellee in*938stituted the suit against appellants on May 15, 1950 as a formal action, in trespass to try title. On October 10, 1950, after various issues had been joined on extensive pleadings filed by the respective parties, the court below granted the motion of appellee for a summary judgment under the provisions of Rule 166-A, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. On appeal to this court, the summary judgment rendered in favor of appellee was reversed and the cause was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fievel v. ZuberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Moore v. GieseckeTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Stone Land & Cattle Co. v. BoonTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Bunn v. City of LaredoTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. McPherson v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drake v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Muller v. Leyendecker, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  3. Muller v. Leyendecker, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API