Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1937No. 18782Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Presiding Judge. —

On June 29, 1937, there was filed with the clerk of this court the appellant’s application for leave to file a second motion for rehearing. At that time the court had adjourned for the term. The decisions are unanimous to the effect that the appellate court is without authority to consider a second motion for rehearing filed after adjournment. See Silver v. State, 9 S. W. (2d) 358; Burleson v. State, 96 S. W. (2d) 785; Secrist v. State, 97 S. W. (2d) 196; McNeese v. State, 52 S. W. (2d) 1049; Ortiz v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Silver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Curg Burleson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. McNeese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. John Secrist v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API