Hill v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion
ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR REHEARING.
MORROW, Presiding Judge. —
On June 29, 1937, there was filed with the clerk of this court the appellant’s application for leave to file a second motion for rehearing. At that time the court had adjourned for the term. The decisions are unanimous to the effect that the appellate court is without authority to consider a second motion for rehearing filed after adjournment. See Silver v. State, 9 S. W. (2d) 358; Burleson v. State, 96 S. W. (2d) 785; Secrist v. State, 97 S. W. (2d) 196; McNeese v. State, 52 S. W. (2d) 1049; Ortiz v.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Silver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Ortiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Curg Burleson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
- McNeese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
- John Secrist v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936