Legal Opinion
David Tarter v. William Raybuck
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 31, 1984No. 83-3174PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
This action was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by David Tarter, and his parents, Judy and Dennis Tarter. The defendants were five administrators of the Cuyahoga Falls City School District, William Ray-buck, David E. Rump, William Spargur, Marianne Rovnyak, and Dr. Harold E. Wil son, and the Cuyahoga Falls Board of Education. The complaint alleged that David, while a student at Cuyahoga Falls High School, had been subjected to an unlawful search by the defendant school administrators, and that David, Judy and Dennis Tarter had been falsely imprisoned by the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Trulock v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- Wrenn v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Jones v. Continental Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Brown v. Borough of ChambersburgCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In Re RubenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.