Legal Opinion

Hoskins v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1976No. 4534PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaper, J., joined by Guthrie, C. J., and Thomas, J.,

GUTHRIE, C. J., filed a separate concurring opinion. ROSE, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which McCLINTOCK, J., joined.

The appellant-defendant was tried before a jury on a charge of grand larceny. He was found guilty and sentenced. Amongst the instructions given by the trial judge before the jury’s retirement to deliberate was the following:

“In order to return a verdict, each juror must agree thereto. The jurors have a duty to consult with one another and to deliberate with a view to reaching an agreement, if it can be done without violence to your individual judgments. Each juror must…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. United States v. Anthony C. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Alcala v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Scheikofsky v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cullin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API