Hoskins v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRaper, J., joined by Guthrie, C. J., and Thomas, J.,
GUTHRIE, C. J., filed a separate concurring opinion. ROSE, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which McCLINTOCK, J., joined.
The appellant-defendant was tried before a jury on a charge of grand larceny. He was found guilty and sentenced. Amongst the instructions given by the trial judge before the jury’s retirement to deliberate was the following:
“In order to return a verdict, each juror must agree thereto. The jurors have a duty to consult with one another and to deliberate with a view to reaching an agreement, if it can be done without violence to your individual judgments. Each juror must…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. Anthony C. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- State v. MaupinOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Alcala v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Stephens v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Scheikofsky v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Cullin v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.