Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Soft Drink Workers Union, Local 812
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 18, 1983No. 83 Civ. 2388(MP)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
MILTON POLLACK, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action against his former employer and his union claiming that the union breached its duty of fair representation to him in connection with the arbitration proceedings regarding his discharge. The Pepsi-Cola defendants have moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The defendant union has moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and for summary judgment. For reasons stated below, the motions for summary judgment are granted and the complaint is dismissed.
Summary of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Palancia v. Roosevelt Raceway, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chiari v. New York Racing Ass'nDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- George v. Hilaire Farm Nursing HomeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Lalley v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 1989
- Patricia v. Delford Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987