Bateman v. Warfield
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Attachment; from city court of Houston county—Judge Brunson. April 15, 1912.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
1. Where one sells another a jack, to be used for the purpose of breeding mules, there is an implied warranty that the jack is reasonably suited to the uses intended; and it follows that where suit was brought on a promissory note given for the purchase-price of such a jack, a plea setting up that the jack was impotent and totally' unsuited for the uses intended should not have béen stricken.
2. In such a case the defendant may plead a breach of such an implied warranty, notwithstanding it was stipulated in the note that the vendor “does not warrant the health or soundness of said animal.” It…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hirsch v. Schofield's Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by4 opinions
- Alford v. KruseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- Watson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
- Wallace v. BleakmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Battle Bros. v. SherlockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916