Walker v. Edgington, 07-Ca-75 (7-11-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Joel Edgington appeals, pro se, from a Civil Stalking Protection Order ("CSPO") entered against him in favor of Robin Walker. Edgington has failed to raise any assignments of error, however, we will construe his appellate brief as raising arguments: (1) that the trial court's decision is against the manifest weight of the evidence; and (2) that he was denied a fair hearing.
{¶ 2} The evidence that Edgington cites in support of his manifest weight argument is not contained in the record before us; therefore we may not consider it. We conclude that the evidence contained in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Celebrezze v. Environmental Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Howard v. WilsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Sweet v. HuntOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Charles v. PetersOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Daniels v. DunsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. ValesOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.