Legal Opinion

Norton v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1986No. 21017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this petition for review, petitioner Bruce D. Norton challenges the decision of the Industrial Commission denying his claim for permanent total disability. Norton contends that the Commission erroneously based its findings on medical impairment alone without examining his earning capacity, ignored his total disability under the “odd-lot” doctrine, and ruled contrary to the evidence produced by him in support of his claim. None of the defendant parties has filed a response. We reverse and remand for a hearing consistent with this opinion.

Norton was employed as a coal miner of United States…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Smith v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. McPhie v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Calogero v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  5. Comeaux v. Cameron Offshore Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Zupon v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Oman v. Industrial Commission of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  4. Ortiz v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  5. Peck v. Eimco Process Equipment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API