Legal Opinion
Brewer Oil Co. v. State ex rel. Udall
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 9, 1995No. 16196PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
1. The Attorney General appeals the district court’s entry of a summary judgment quashing five civil investigative demands (CIDs). The only question to be resolved is whether the record before the district court established beyond genuine dispute that the Attorney General had no proper purpose for seeking the CIDs. Because we answer in the negative, we reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
2. The New Mexico Antitrust Act, NMSA 1978, §§ 57-1-1 to -15 (Repl.Pamp.1995), authorizes the Attorney General to apply to the Santa Fe County…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Trade Commission v. Invention Submission CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Aqua Media, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- National Excess Insurance v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- National Excess Ins. Co. v. BinghamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson Corp. v. State Ex Rel. UdallNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996