Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Burnet
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRONER, Associate Justice.
Appellant is a building and loan associa-, tion organized under the laws of California. In its income tax returns it deducted as a part of its expenses sums paid to its stockholders semiannually for the years 1931 to 1926, inclusive. The Board decided against the claim, and the question we have to decide is whether amounts paid by appellant to the holders of its “passbook stock” and/or. its “fall-paid capital stock” were nondednetible dividend distributions or were interest payments.
Tbe applicable statute is section 234 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1921, 42 Stat. 227.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coltrane v. BlakeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
- Henry v. Continental Bldg. Etc. Assoc.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Groover v. Pacific Coast Sav. SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Pacific Coast Savings Society v. SturdevantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- In re Western States Building-Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commissioner of Int. Rev. v. Meridian & Thirteenth R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. OPP Holding Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
- Jewel Tea Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Commissioner of Internal Rev. v. Schmoll Fils AssociatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Fidelity-Bankers Trust Co. v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.