Pacific Coast Savings Society v. Sturdevant
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The Pacific Coast Savings Society was incorporated in January, 1891. Its general purposes, as defined in the articles of incorporation, are described in the opinion of this court in the recent case of Groover v. Pacific Coast Savings Society, 164 Cal. 67, [127 Pac. 495]. In the consideration of the questions presented by the appeals now before ,us, it may be assumed that the society is a building and loan association, as it has been treated by all of the parties to the litigation.
After its organization the society adopted a code of by-laws and commenced to transact business. On the nineteenth…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Leahy v. National Building & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Hohenshell v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Reddick v. United States Building & Loan Association's AssigneeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Rabbitt v. WilcoxenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Groover v. Pacific Coast Sav. SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Drapeau v. Custodians of Telluride Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- In Re Pacific Coast Bldg.-Loan Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Elliott v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. BurnetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Harry E. Jones, Inc. v. KempCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.