Charles E. Nicholson, Jr. And Margaret K. Nicholson v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge:
The genesis of this appeal is a decision by the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service (“the Commissioner”) to disallow certain deductions claimed by Charles and Margaret Nicholson on their 1983, 1984, 1985, and 1986 tax returns regarding computer equipment that Charles Nicholson acquired in 1983. The Commissioner maintained that the Nicholsons were not entitled to take the deductions because Charles Nicholson was not “at risk” regarding a promissory note that he gave in partial payment for the equipment. Prior to a trial before the tax court on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Frank E. & Mildred E. Rickel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Powers v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Karen Kingman Kenagy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Sidney Estridge, James F. O'crowley, Jr., Herbert MaslinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of Baird v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Estate of Palumbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Rapower-3, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2018
- Estate of Rao v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Oelsner v. Government of the Virgin Islands of the United States Ex Rel. Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.