Estate of Baird v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
E. GRADY JOLLY,' Circuit Judge:
The Tax Court held that the taxpayers, the estates of a deceased husband and wife, were not entitled to an award of administrative and litigation costs because the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“IRS”) was substantially justified in taking the position that the only discount allowable when valuing the decedents’ non-controlling fractional interests in Louisiana timberland was the cost of partitioning the property. The taxpayers appeal, contending that the IRS did not meet its burden of proving that its position was substantially justified. We conclude that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- The Estate of Mary Frances Smith Bright, Deceased, by H. R. Bright, Independent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Minahan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
- Estate of Hall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. 515 Granby, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- Estate of Elkins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Estate of Elkins v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Estate of James A. Elkins, Jr., Margaret Elise Joseph and Leslie Keith Sasser, Independent Executors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
- Estate of James A. Elkins, Jr., Margaret Elise Joseph and Leslie Keith Sasser, Independent Executors v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.