Legal Opinion

Patchen v. Government Employers Insurance

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided January 7, 2011No. 2:10-cv-02056PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This putative class action arises out of the defendant auto insurance company’s specification of less expensive and allegedly inferior auto parts in its repair estimates for damaged vehicles. The defendants, Government Employers Insurance Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO Indemnity Company, and GEICO General Insurance Company (consistent with both parties’ usage, the Court refers to these entities collectively as “GEICO” or “the defendant”), presently move to dismiss all of the plaintiffs’ claims. For the reasons that follow, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Leder v. American Traffic Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. Baker v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2017
  3. LPD N.Y., LLC v. Adidas Am., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  4. Beeney v. FCA US, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2023
  5. Candelario v. GEICO CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API